Christian accountability is a touchy subject these days.  It is an especially touchy subject for me because I spent six and a half years of my life in a Christian Church that was, by all social standards, very unhealthy (bordering on “cultish”, if it wasn’t in fact a full-blown Christian cult).  Accountability in that church looked like life-control more than sin-elimination.

But sin-elimination is the point.  Our motives are extremely important and so are the results.  I think the means take a back-seat to the motives and the results.  Just take a look at Phil Jackson, the coach of the Lakers.  Here is a guy whose methods and means are quite unusual.  He had the Lakers visualizing themselves as frogs on lillypads before game 4 of the NBA Finals!  Those methods are not questioned but imitated, because he has gotten results.  10 NBA championships speak for themself.

Now let’s refocus on the idea of sin-elimination with another metaphor.  A friend of mine does not believe in spanking her child.  I understand that.  No one but a sicko enjoys the actual act of spanking a child.  However, I get pleasure in disciplining my sons for the sake of their character and moral development.  That is the hoped-for result.  The motive is love, plain and simple.  (I am not suggesting my friend does not love her children, don’t get me wrong.  I think we disagree on the eventual character of disciplined children who receive the “rod” and those who do not.)

Now to the main point.  John Wesley was God’s gift to His Church in that he established SMALL GROUP MINISTRY for the sake of developing disciples.  Most large and successful churches around the world employ small groups as a huge part of their church life and practice.  They are used for discipleship, Bible study, prayer, fellowship, and other essentials of Christian growth.  As he and George Whitefield and Jonathan Edwards road the wave of the First Great Awakening, he understood that something would have to be done to receive and develop the huge numbers of Christian converts into mature Christian believers.  He established class, band, and society meetings–SMALL GROUPS.

At a class meeting, recent converts would be asked 5 penetrating questions:

1.  What known sins have you committed since our last meeting?

2.  What temptations have you met with?

3.  Were you delivered?

4.  What have you thought, said, or done which you question whether was sin or not?

5.  Have you nothing you desire to keep secret?

WOW!  Can you imagine the fidgeting and nervous laughter taking place at those meetings?  Some people today would call that an abusive invasion of privacy.  Would you?  I believe that Wesley’s motives were to see a HOLY, sinless group of people.  Did he achieve that?  By all accounts, YES!  The Methodist Church exploded in numbers and converts in Great Britain and the US and around the world.  The resulting piety of the British lower classes has been widely understood to have prevented a political revolution similar to the one that bloodied France in the late 1700’s.  Innumerable hospitals, churches, schools, and humanitarian agencies were spawned in the centuries following.  I could go on.

Anyway, could we handle that kind of strict accountability?  Should we call for that again?  Was that methodology for another age and culture?  I am not sure.  Whaddaya think?

3 Responses to “Getting Up In Each Other’s Business!”

  1. reformedfred said

    It’s interesting that the 5 questions were asked of “recent converts”. It has been my experience that “sin” with maturing believers becomes increasingly subtle and easily masked. Either way, these questions would be best kept between 2 or 3 people in a private, mutual,accountability-style relationship, rather than within the small group environment.

    Also, if Wesley truly wanted to see a HOLY and sinless group of people, it would seem that this speaks more to Wesley’s feelings of inadequacy and need for perfection rather than one who fully embraced the idea that “My grace is sufficient for you”.

  2. David Goss said

    It was certainly strict. Wesley was also convicted of the call to “Christian Perfection” (his most outspoken and oft-defended theological understanding). Whether Wesley really understood the words you quote which Jesus spoke to Paul is another matter (“My Grace is Sufficient”). It is thought that he might not have. Yet I wonder if Paul and Wesley (and Luther and…) were similar in this. The men and women who write history all have some kind of ‘burr in their saddle’ that keeps them restless, laboring and dissatisifed with the way things are.
    I agree with your assessment of small group relationships. 2-3 is a good number. The big groups lend themselves to sin-masking all the time! We have to address that it seems. Perhaps once we put to rest the cult of testimony, where we celebrate the former gangbanger/drug dealer who gets saved but don’t celebrate equally the 60 year old retiree who drew near to God at a spiritual retreat for the first time. God doesn’t rank sins! (even if Milton did.)

  3. Nancy Irwin said

    I love this dialoge. I am so clear today that God wants peace for us all. I don’t believe the sin is to be confessed and washed away because we confess it rather because we ADMIT. In admitting comes the peace and opening of the heart to recieve God. As this takes place and our hearts are open we CAN’T HELP but hear God. So small group, big group, one on one.. if there is a secret or a sin to be released from DO IT…. God is waiting so our hearts will open up to his love, it’s not that he isn’t there we just can’t hear it because we are blocked.
    I maybe simple and nieve perhaps but keeping it simple is my moto.

Leave a Reply